Hockey History
Lawfield Arena opens in 1975 after three years of study
and deliberation
East Mountain arena noted
as the warmest facility in the area

By 1970 Hamilton needed local arenas and skating facilities for
it citizens on the Mountain, which was experiencing the highest
population growth of the city.
In 1972, a proposal was brought
before the city for a twin-rink arena at the corner of Upper Ottawa
Street and Stone Church Road. This proposed rink was one of five “multi-centers” to
be built on the Mountain to provide these local services and activities.
The city’s planning committee was considering facilities
on Stone Church at the intersections of Upper Ottawa, Upper Sherman,
Upper Wellington, West Fifth, and Paradise Road.
The proposed locations
were interesting at the time, considering the following quote from
a December 1972 Spectator report:
“None of these north-south
streets will connect with the proposed Mountain Freeway to be built
near Limeridge Road.”
One party that was interested in a new
hockey facility was Hamilton Red Wings owner Nick Durbano, who
was hoping for a 3500-seat rink in the Upper Ottawa-Stonchurch
location for his 1974-75 Major Junior A club to play in.
By May
of 1973 the five sites were down to two, one proposal at the eastern
end of Mohawk Road in the Bernie Arbour sports complex and the
other in the Lawfield neighborhood. The city was opting for the
Lawfield site.
“City planners are now recommending a site
in the Lawfield neighborhood could be preferable because it is
closer to existing subdivisions,” mentioned a story in the
May 19, 1973 Spectator.
The Bernie Arbour site was rejected by the committee as being too
remote and isolated, and was leaning to an arena to be built on
Berko Avenue, a $750,000 building to be erected on the 28-acre
school-neighborhood complex.
But then Hamilton Alderman Ian Stout
was pushing the Bernie Arbour site, and was championing for the
eastern Mountain location. His main concern was traffic congestion
at the other proposed site.
Stout lost his support for his preference
at a July 31 1973 city council meeting as council decided to follow
the recommendations of the recreation and planning committees and
establish Lawfield as the site.
By February of 1974 the architectural
firm of McIntosh and Moellar had been hired for the new facility,
which was to be similar to the Rosedale Arena and cost around $800,000.
Only two months later another $106,000 was deemed necessary to
continue with the new arena, to be built on an eight-acre site
on Folkstone Road in the Lawfield neighborhood.
But Stout continued
with his campaign, and expressed his displeasure with the increase
in costs.
“A lot of screwing around delayed this thing,” he
was quoted as saying late in April of 1974. “We had Ontario
Municipal Board approval for the project in 1972,” adding
the location delay had added 15 percent to the cost.
And the costs
did continue to escalate. By September of 1974 the original $800,000
figure had climbed to over $1 million, a 25 percent increase in
five months.
But the Lawfield Arena was built, and on November 24,
1975, opening ceremonies were held for the center, which featured
a year-round ice surface, tennis courts, and community rooms. Other
activities along with hockey for Lawfield included figure skating
sessions and ringette competitions.
By the early 1980s the arena
needed new flooring, and all the in-floor piping as well as boarding
had to be replaced, inconveniencing many minor sporting groups
until early in 1983 when the facility reopened.
Lawfield has the
honor of being the warmest rink in Hamilton for those sitting in
its seats.
In March 2003, Spectator writer Scott Radley wrote a piece comparing
the creature comforts of 25 local rinks. Lawfield came out on top
with a temperature of 8.8 degrees while the 1954-vintage Eastwood
rink was at the other end with a temperature of -4.7 degrees.
“At
the same time that Eastwood’s bleachers were nearly
empty due to the unrelenting chill, Lawfield’s were full,” wrote
Radley. “Fans with their coats unwrapped and gloves stuffed
into their pockets looked completely comfortable. Nobody has to
keep active to stay warm. At Lawfield, coffee is an enjoyable drink,
not a survival tool.”
BACK
HOME
|